From brian at reid.org Mon Feb 1 00:17:50 2010 From: brian at reid.org (Brian Reid) Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:17:50 -0800 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Update? In-Reply-To: <63993F25D1C68EF750C5FF4A@steven-frysingers-ibook-g4.local> References: <63993F25D1C68EF750C5FF4A@steven-frysingers-ibook-g4.local> Message-ID: <70072CD4D0F6413823FA1D00@rutabook.waverley.reid.org> My experience is that if an older UW IMAP server has two sessions open on the same mailbox and both of them are updating it, one of them will drop unexpectedly a few times an hour. I got in the habit of logging off Mulberry at home before I went to work, and this stopped happening to me. When I installed the then-newest UW IMAP server about 2 years ago, this problem stopped happening. And since I stopped caring -- it was fixed -- I didn't take the time to see what change had made it stop doing this. From frysinsp at jmu.edu Mon Feb 1 02:13:51 2010 From: frysinsp at jmu.edu (Dr. Steven P. Frysinger) Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:13:51 -0500 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Update? In-Reply-To: <70072CD4D0F6413823FA1D00@rutabook.waverley.reid.org> References: <63993F25D1C68EF750C5FF4A@steven-frysingers-ibook-g4.local> <70072CD4D0F6413823FA1D00@rutabook.waverley.reid.org> Message-ID: <6889345AEC460E62D6664C14@steven-frysingers-ibook-g4.local> --On January 31, 2010 9:17:50 PM -0800 Brian Reid wrote: > My experience is that if an older UW IMAP server has two sessions open on > the same mailbox and both of them are updating it, one of them will drop > unexpectedly a few times an hour. I got in the habit of logging off > Mulberry at home before I went to work, and this stopped happening to me. Many years ago I noticed this too, and got in the habit of logging off - so unfortunately this isn't the problem. > When I installed the then-newest UW IMAP server about 2 years ago, this > problem stopped happening. And since I stopped caring -- it was fixed -- > I didn't take the time to see what change had made it stop doing this. Apparently it's a deficiency on the part of JMU's server, but there was a fix that could be done in Mulberry. JMU is about to switch to a different server, so maybe I'll get lucky and the problem will clear itself up. On the other hand, they're moving to an Exchange server... Steve ******************************************** Steven P. Frysinger, Ph.D. Professor, Integrated Science and Technology Program Computer Science Program Director, Environmental Information Systems Program Environmental Management Program Center for Environment, Health and Safety James Madison University College of Integrated Science and Technology ISAT/CS Room 309 800 South Main Street - MSC 4102 Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807 United States of America Tel: 540/568-2710 Fax: 540/568-2768 Net: frysinsp at jmu.edu Web: http://www.isat.jmu.edu/faculty/frysinger.html --------------------- Gastprofessor, Fakult?t f?r Ingenieurwissenschaften Environmental Informatics Group (EIG) Hochschule f?r Technik und Wirtschaft (HTW) des Saarlandes Goebenstra?e 40 66117 Saarbr?cken Germany Cell: +49 (0)175 955 2303 Tel: +49 (0)681 876 5665 Net: Steven.Frysinger at enviromatics.net From di at fh-wedel.de Mon Feb 1 03:15:01 2010 From: di at fh-wedel.de (Martin Dietze) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:15:01 +0100 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Update? In-Reply-To: <63993F25D1C68EF750C5FF4A@steven-frysingers-ibook-g4.local> References: <63993F25D1C68EF750C5FF4A@steven-frysingers-ibook-g4.local> Message-ID: <20100201081501.GC2346@fh-wedel.de> On Sun, January 31, 2010, Dr. Steven P. Frysinger wrote: > Did I gather correctly that somebody is working on an updated version of > Mulberry? There has been some effort (see the -dev mailing list). There is also a pretty stable 4.1 branch, for which different people provided binaries (I have some Debian builds on my web site, see URL below). Unfortunately I have not seen much progress in the last weeks, it seems like Cyrus has very little time for finalising the branch, so for the time being you may have to rely on unofficial builds. On the bug you mentioned I can't comment, maybe it's fixed, maybe not. If there is a patch around and it has not found its way into the repo, then you might post it to the -dev mailing list; those of us running private branches may want to pick it up and integrate it into their code. Cheers, M'bert -- ----------- / http://herbert.the-little-red-haired-girl.org / ------------- =+= HAS ANYBODY SEEN MY CAPS_LOCK KEY? __ SHIFTY at AOL:COM From paul.p.franz at gmail.com Tue Feb 2 18:30:18 2010 From: paul.p.franz at gmail.com (Paul Franz) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:30:18 -0500 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Problem building Mulberry on the Mac Message-ID: <246b04ae1002021530o51671001he794f2f8e14b6842@mail.gmail.com> I was going to work on somethings that I don't like about Mulberry. Like the way the selection changes after deleting a message when viewing and Inbox using the Threaded view. I was wondering if anybody else has successfully compiled Mulberry. Paul Franz From Hagedorn at uni-koeln.de Wed Feb 3 01:21:01 2010 From: Hagedorn at uni-koeln.de (Sebastian Hagedorn) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:21:01 +0100 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Problem building Mulberry on the Mac In-Reply-To: <246b04ae1002021530o51671001he794f2f8e14b6842@mail.gmail.com> References: <246b04ae1002021530o51671001he794f2f8e14b6842@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <5EADA765EF12EC9D13040B82@G5.local> -- Paul Franz is rumored to have mumbled on 2. Februar 2010 18:30:18 -0500 regarding [Mulberry-discuss] Problem building Mulberry on the Mac: > I was going to work on somethings that I don't like about Mulberry. > Like the way the selection changes after deleting a message when > viewing and Inbox using the Threaded view. > > I was wondering if anybody else has successfully compiled Mulberry. Yes, but it's been a while ... check the archives for hints. -- Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Flachbau), Zi. 18, Robert-Koch-Str. 10 Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK) Universit?t zu K?ln / Cologne University - Tel. +49-221-478-5587 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5292 bytes Desc: not available URL: From paul.p.franz at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 07:00:58 2010 From: paul.p.franz at gmail.com (Paul Franz) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:00:58 -0500 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Problem building Mulberry on the Mac In-Reply-To: <5EADA765EF12EC9D13040B82@G5.local> References: <246b04ae1002021530o51671001he794f2f8e14b6842@mail.gmail.com> <5EADA765EF12EC9D13040B82@G5.local> Message-ID: <246b04ae1002030400n23d4f475v2fbdd9f4dd9dc0ef@mail.gmail.com> Ok. I will check. Though some of the plugins can't find the includes like PGP and Kerberos and SMIME is having link issues. BTW, how does one submit a patch? I have a few clean ups that allow Mulberry to be compiled using GCC 4.2 (just adding some "class XXX" to a few header files). Now, it doesn't currently link, BUT it s a minor step forward. Paul Franz On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: > -- Paul Franz is rumored to have mumbled on 2. > Februar 2010 18:30:18 -0500 regarding [Mulberry-discuss] Problem building > Mulberry on the Mac: > >> I was going to work on somethings that I don't like about Mulberry. >> Like the way the selection changes after deleting a message when >> viewing and Inbox using the Threaded view. >> >> I was wondering if anybody else has successfully compiled Mulberry. > > Yes, but it's been a while ... check the archives for hints. > -- > Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Flachbau), Zi. 18, Robert-Koch-Str. 10 > Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK) > Universit?t zu K?ln / Cologne University - Tel. +49-221-478-5587 From mailinglists at nierenschaden.de Wed Feb 3 07:20:53 2010 From: mailinglists at nierenschaden.de (=?UTF-8?Q?Jens_D=C3=B6nhoff?=) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:20:53 +0100 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Problem building Mulberry on the Mac In-Reply-To: <246b04ae1002030400n23d4f475v2fbdd9f4dd9dc0ef@mail.gmail.com> References: <246b04ae1002021530o51671001he794f2f8e14b6842@mail.gmail.com> <5EADA765EF12EC9D13040B82@G5.local> <246b04ae1002030400n23d4f475v2fbdd9f4dd9dc0ef@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <38AB90610F42FFD119E2EB6D@[10.17.76.212]> Hi Paul, I would propose continuing any discussion regarding development (building, patching etc.) on the mulberry-dev-list. At the moment the preferred way of submitting patches is via the (dev) mailinglist, but this is an interim solution for now. What version of the sources are you trying to build from? There are different versions of the latest 4.1d1 branch, perhaps causing a little confusing. That's why Sebastian mentioned reading the archives, because some building problems (mostly for the Linux version, though) have already been fixed in a shared 4.1d1 branch, which is not mentioned in the wiki (I think). Greetings, Jens -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From paul.p.franz at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 09:47:39 2010 From: paul.p.franz at gmail.com (Paul Franz) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:47:39 -0500 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Problem building Mulberry on the Mac In-Reply-To: <38AB90610F42FFD119E2EB6D@10.17.76.212> References: <246b04ae1002021530o51671001he794f2f8e14b6842@mail.gmail.com> <5EADA765EF12EC9D13040B82@G5.local> <246b04ae1002030400n23d4f475v2fbdd9f4dd9dc0ef@mail.gmail.com> <38AB90610F42FFD119E2EB6D@10.17.76.212> Message-ID: <246b04ae1002030647s3878ded9n98866c9532f180d8@mail.gmail.com> Oops!! Sorry. I thought I was replying to the dev list. (I posted to this list and then realized the I should post to the dev list (dup'd the post there), haven't got a response from them yet.) I will discontinue this thread. Paul Franz On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Jens D?nhoff wrote: > Hi Paul, > > I would propose continuing any discussion regarding development (building, > patching etc.) on the mulberry-dev-list. > > At the moment the preferred way of submitting patches is via the (dev) > mailinglist, but this is an interim solution for now. > > What version of the sources are you trying to build from? There are > different versions of the latest 4.1d1 branch, perhaps causing a little > confusing. That's why Sebastian mentioned reading the archives, because some > building problems (mostly for the Linux version, though) have already been > fixed in a shared 4.1d1 branch, which is not mentioned in the wiki (I > think). > > Greetings, > > Jens From gessel at blackrosetech.com Fri Feb 5 11:34:33 2010 From: gessel at blackrosetech.com (David Gessel) Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:34:33 -0500 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Feature? Right click on link, get choice of browser to open in Message-ID: As browser options have proliferated, it is likely that one would have different favorite browsers for different tasks. Or perhaps to segregate cookies or maintain different profiles on a single site each with automatic login. It would be nice if one was able to create a list of helper app executables and right click on appropriate resources (say, URL) and then select the best handler from the task. From paul.p.franz at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 12:07:40 2010 From: paul.p.franz at gmail.com (Paul Franz) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 12:07:40 -0500 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Feature? Right click on link, get choice of browser to open in In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <246b04ae1002050907q11f9d8cbkd2acdbd5cd665ec@mail.gmail.com> If this is for the Mac, isn't there a 3rd party application that handles this. (I forget the name off the top of the my head, will look if you are a Mac user. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:34 AM, David Gessel wrote: > As browser options have proliferated, it is likely that one would have > different favorite browsers for different tasks. ?Or perhaps to segregate > cookies or maintain different profiles on a single site each with automatic > login. > > It would be nice if one was able to create a list of helper app executables > and right click on appropriate resources (say, URL) and then select the best > handler from the task. > From shiva at sewingwitch.com Fri Feb 5 12:50:46 2010 From: shiva at sewingwitch.com (Kenneth Porter) Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:50:46 -0800 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Feature? Right click on link, get choice of browser to open in In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <111F6347380BFCB4434F61A9@[10.170.7.6]> --On Friday, February 05, 2010 11:34 AM -0500 David Gessel wrote: > As browser options have proliferated, it is likely that one would have > different favorite browsers for different tasks. Or perhaps to segregate > cookies or maintain different profiles on a single site each with > automatic login. > > It would be nice if one was able to create a list of helper app > executables and right click on appropriate resources (say, URL) and then > select the best handler from the task. This is generally considered the responsibility of the "desktop environment". (Sometimes confused with the "operating system"; with Windows the desktop is supplied as a part of the OS but in other systems it's a distinct component.) It's implemented by an entry in the registry for each protocol (the "http" part of the URI). The registry only has one slot for a program, so the only way to do it there is to provide a proxy launcher that asks you each time and then launches the real browser. From gessel at blackrosetech.com Fri Feb 5 17:10:10 2010 From: gessel at blackrosetech.com (David Gessel) Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:10:10 -0500 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Feature? Right click on link, get choice of browser to open in In-Reply-To: <246b04ae1002050907q11f9d8cbkd2acdbd5cd665ec@mail.gmail.com> References: <246b04ae1002050907q11f9d8cbkd2acdbd5cd665ec@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Alas... XP still. I know, so obsolete, but so it goes. --On Friday, February 05, 2010 12:07 PM -0500 Paul Franz wrote: > If this is for the Mac, isn't there a 3rd party application that > handles this. (I forget the name off the top of the my head, will look > if you are a Mac user. > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:34 AM, David Gessel > wrote: >> As browser options have proliferated, it is likely that one would have >> different favorite browsers for different tasks. ?Or perhaps to >> segregate cookies or maintain different profiles on a single site each >> with automatic login. >> >> It would be nice if one was able to create a list of helper app >> executables and right click on appropriate resources (say, URL) and then >> select the best handler from the task. >> > > From paul.p.franz at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 21:24:53 2010 From: paul.p.franz at gmail.com (Paul Franz) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 21:24:53 -0500 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Feature? Right click on link, get choice of browser to open in In-Reply-To: References: <246b04ae1002050907q11f9d8cbkd2acdbd5cd665ec@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <246b04ae1002051824lee2d0d5vbbd70a83abdbbf0e@mail.gmail.com> Hey, until Windows 7 there was no reason to upgrade. Paul Franz On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:10 PM, David Gessel wrote: > Alas... XP still. ?I know, so obsolete, but so it goes. > > --On Friday, February 05, 2010 12:07 PM -0500 Paul Franz > wrote: > >> If this is for the Mac, isn't there a 3rd party application that >> handles this. (I forget the name off the top of the my head, will look >> if you are a Mac user. >> >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:34 AM, David Gessel >> wrote: >>> >>> As browser options have proliferated, it is likely that one would have >>> different favorite browsers for different tasks. ?Or perhaps to >>> segregate cookies or maintain different profiles on a single site each >>> with automatic login. >>> >>> It would be nice if one was able to create a list of helper app >>> executables and right click on appropriate resources (say, URL) and then >>> select the best handler from the task. >>> >> >> > > > From klensin+mulberry at jck.com Fri Feb 5 22:09:30 2010 From: klensin+mulberry at jck.com (John C Klensin) Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:09:30 -0500 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Feature? Right click on link, get choice of browser to open in In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: --On Friday, February 05, 2010 09:50:46 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote... > --On Friday, February 05, 2010 11:34 AM -0500 David Gessel > wrote: > >> As browser options have proliferated, it is likely that one >> would have different favorite browsers for different tasks. >> Or perhaps to segregate cookies or maintain different >> profiles on a single site each with automatic login. >... > This is generally considered the responsibility of the > "desktop environment". (Sometimes confused with the > "operating system"; with Windows the desktop is supplied as a > part of the OS but in other systems it's a distinct > component.) It's implemented by an entry in the registry for > each protocol (the "http" part of the URI). The registry only > has one slot for a program, so the only way to do it there is > to provide a proxy launcher that asks you each time and then > launches the real browser. I think I've discarded the code that does it more elegantly (I now use Firefox with a plugin called "IE View" and let it sort things out), but, under XP and earlier versions of Windows (I disclaim any knowledge of Vista or Win7), if you can create a small program or batch file that asks you to make a choice and then branches, this is easily accomplished by going into Windows Explorer, selecting the Tools tab and "Folder Options", then "File Types", and setting the HTML and HTM entries to point to your trick dispatcher. This should take care of Mulberry as well as everything else on your system -- giving you a choice each time. In a perfect world, Mulberry would probably have a way to override desktop settings for mail-specific purposes, but, as far as I know, that is not possible through 4.0.8 at least. john From gessel at blackrosetech.com Fri Feb 5 23:30:09 2010 From: gessel at blackrosetech.com (David Gessel) Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:30:09 -0800 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Feature? Right click on link, get choice of browser to open in In-Reply-To: <246b04ae1002051824lee2d0d5vbbd70a83abdbbf0e@mail.gmail.com> References: <246b04ae1002050907q11f9d8cbkd2acdbd5cd665ec@mail.gmail.com> <246b04ae1002051824lee2d0d5vbbd70a83abdbbf0e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1B18658D9E8FE2A9FD064124@bernadinism> A powerful disincentive even. For me 7 is iffy, but I'm old and when I'm not keeping the kids off my lawn I do my best to restore Win 2000 behaviors where possible. --On Friday, February 05, 2010 9:24 PM -0500 Paul Franz wrote: > Hey, until Windows 7 there was no reason to upgrade. > > Paul Franz > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:10 PM, David Gessel > wrote: >> Alas... XP still. ?I know, so obsolete, but so it goes. >> >> --On Friday, February 05, 2010 12:07 PM -0500 Paul Franz >> wrote: >> >>> If this is for the Mac, isn't there a 3rd party application that >>> handles this. (I forget the name off the top of the my head, will look >>> if you are a Mac user. >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:34 AM, David Gessel >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> As browser options have proliferated, it is likely that one would have >>>> different favorite browsers for different tasks. ?Or perhaps to >>>> segregate cookies or maintain different profiles on a single site each >>>> with automatic login. >>>> >>>> It would be nice if one was able to create a list of helper app >>>> executables and right click on appropriate resources (say, URL) and >>>> then select the best handler from the task. >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > From paul.p.franz at gmail.com Sat Feb 6 00:13:25 2010 From: paul.p.franz at gmail.com (Paul Franz) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 00:13:25 -0500 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Feature? Right click on link, get choice of browser to open in In-Reply-To: <1B18658D9E8FE2A9FD064124@bernadinism> References: <246b04ae1002050907q11f9d8cbkd2acdbd5cd665ec@mail.gmail.com> <246b04ae1002051824lee2d0d5vbbd70a83abdbbf0e@mail.gmail.com> <1B18658D9E8FE2A9FD064124@bernadinism> Message-ID: <246b04ae1002052113o5191f002o3e75453351192429@mail.gmail.com> Ah, undetstood. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:30 PM, David Gessel wrote: > A powerful disincentive even. ?For me 7 is iffy, but I'm old and when I'm > not keeping the kids off my lawn I do my best to restore Win 2000 behaviors > where possible. > > > --On Friday, February 05, 2010 9:24 PM -0500 Paul Franz > wrote: > >> Hey, until Windows 7 there was no reason to upgrade. >> >> Paul Franz >> >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:10 PM, David Gessel >> wrote: >>> >>> Alas... XP still. ?I know, so obsolete, but so it goes. >>> >>> --On Friday, February 05, 2010 12:07 PM -0500 Paul Franz >>> wrote: >>> >>>> If this is for the Mac, isn't there a 3rd party application that >>>> handles this. (I forget the name off the top of the my head, will look >>>> if you are a Mac user. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:34 AM, David Gessel >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> As browser options have proliferated, it is likely that one would have >>>>> different favorite browsers for different tasks. ?Or perhaps to >>>>> segregate cookies or maintain different profiles on a single site each >>>>> with automatic login. >>>>> >>>>> It would be nice if one was able to create a list of helper app >>>>> executables and right click on appropriate resources (say, URL) and >>>>> then select the best handler from the task. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > From shiva at sewingwitch.com Sat Feb 6 09:34:31 2010 From: shiva at sewingwitch.com (Kenneth Porter) Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:34:31 -0800 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Windows versions (was: Feature? Right click on link, get choice of browser to open in) In-Reply-To: <1B18658D9E8FE2A9FD064124@bernadinism> References: <246b04ae1002050907q11f9d8cbkd2acdbd5cd665ec@mail.gmail.com> <246b04ae1002051824lee2d0d5vbbd70a83abdbbf0e@mail.gmail.com> <1B18658D9E8FE2A9FD064124@bernadinism> Message-ID: <524A79689E333CEF384C6A2A@[10.170.7.6]> --On Friday, February 05, 2010 8:30 PM -0800 David Gessel wrote: > A powerful disincentive even. For me 7 is iffy, but I'm old and when I'm > not keeping the kids off my lawn I do my best to restore Win 2000 > behaviors where possible. The later OS's are more secure, at the cost of massive memory usage for all the bling for the youngsters. I think the poor rap that Vista got was because a lot of people tried to run it on XP-capable machines that simply lacked the vast resources that Vista requires. XP had the same problem following 2k, as it was also proportionately a pig, and those of us old enough recall that 2k had the same issue following NT. So when you do upgrade Windows, be prepared to upgrade the hardware to match. It's gonna suck on older hardware. From frysinsp at jmu.edu Sat Feb 6 09:54:48 2010 From: frysinsp at jmu.edu (Dr. Steven P. Frysinger) Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 09:54:48 -0500 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Feature? Right click on link, get choice of browser to open in In-Reply-To: <246b04ae1002052113o5191f002o3e75453351192429@mail.gmail.com> References: <246b04ae1002050907q11f9d8cbkd2acdbd5cd665ec@mail.gmail.com> <246b04ae1002051824lee2d0d5vbbd70a83abdbbf0e@mail.gmail.com> <1B18658D9E8FE2A9FD064124@bernadinism> <246b04ae1002052113o5191f002o3e75453351192429@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: I solved that problem by switching to Mac OS when they adopted Unix. Being a Bell Labs vet it was like going home, and I've never looked back. Steve --On February 6, 2010 12:13:25 AM -0500 Paul Franz wrote: > Ah, undetstood. > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:30 PM, David Gessel > wrote: >> A powerful disincentive even. ?For me 7 is iffy, but I'm old and when >> I'm not keeping the kids off my lawn I do my best to restore Win 2000 >> behaviors where possible. >> >> >> --On Friday, February 05, 2010 9:24 PM -0500 Paul Franz >> wrote: >> >>> Hey, until Windows 7 there was no reason to upgrade. >>> >>> Paul Franz >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:10 PM, David Gessel >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Alas... XP still. ?I know, so obsolete, but so it goes. >>>> >>>> --On Friday, February 05, 2010 12:07 PM -0500 Paul Franz >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> If this is for the Mac, isn't there a 3rd party application that >>>>> handles this. (I forget the name off the top of the my head, will look >>>>> if you are a Mac user. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:34 AM, David Gessel >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> As browser options have proliferated, it is likely that one would >>>>>> have different favorite browsers for different tasks. ?Or perhaps to >>>>>> segregate cookies or maintain different profiles on a single site >>>>>> each with automatic login. >>>>>> >>>>>> It would be nice if one was able to create a list of helper app >>>>>> executables and right click on appropriate resources (say, URL) and >>>>>> then select the best handler from the task. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> ******************************************** Steven P. Frysinger, Ph.D. Professor, Integrated Science and Technology Program Computer Science Program Director, Environmental Information Systems Program Environmental Management Program Center for Environment, Health and Safety James Madison University College of Integrated Science and Technology ISAT/CS Room 309 800 South Main Street - MSC 4102 Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807 United States of America Tel: 540/568-2710 Fax: 540/568-2768 Net: frysinsp at jmu.edu Web: http://www.isat.jmu.edu/faculty/frysinger.html --------------------- Gastprofessor, Fakult?t f?r Ingenieurwissenschaften Environmental Informatics Group (EIG) Hochschule f?r Technik und Wirtschaft (HTW) des Saarlandes Goebenstra?e 40 66117 Saarbr?cken Germany Cell: +49 (0)175 955 2303 Tel: +49 (0)681 876 5665 Net: Steven.Frysinger at enviromatics.net From haqq42 at gmail.com Sun Feb 7 04:34:25 2010 From: haqq42 at gmail.com (Abdul Haqq) Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:34:25 +1100 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Mulberry Setup Message-ID: <4B6E8921.2050304@gmail.com> Hi I am a Newbie to Mulberry so please bear with me I am just coming over from Thunderbird my reason for doing so is better spelling support and Mulberry defiantly has this. I have set up 2 of my accounts for now. My problem I am having is with Identities. I have set up the two identities and checked "Used Tied Identities with New Drafts", but it does not work, whatever mailbox I am in and press Drafts it always comes up with the default Identity. What may I be doing wrong? I have followed the directions in the Mulberry Reference Guide v4 Thanks From F.von-Prondzynski at dcu.ie Sun Feb 7 20:04:50 2010 From: F.von-Prondzynski at dcu.ie (Ferdinand von Prondzynski) Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:04:50 +0000 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Mulberry Setup In-Reply-To: <4B6E8921.2050304@gmail.com> References: <4B6E8921.2050304@gmail.com> Message-ID: <67234DA52BEE5892D558412D@1C00C67AE8C08ACDFFB63A33> Abdul, if you open Preferences and Identities and click on 'change', you can then specify which email address should be the default sender's address for any email with this identity. You also have the option of changing the 'from' address in the drop down menu of every draft that you create. ----------------------------------------------- Professor Ferdinand von Prondzynski President of Dublin City University Dublin 9 / IRELAND +353-1-7005666 F.von-Prondzynski at dcu.ie From huberb at earthlink.net Sun Feb 14 11:47:09 2010 From: huberb at earthlink.net (Bill Huber) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:47:09 -0600 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Set up problem Message-ID: <4B78290D.1020707@earthlink.net> Hi, I've downloaded and installed Mulberry on a Netbook I use for work. I am not a sophisticated computer guy, but set up and install programs and accounts regularly. I have an Earthlink account for personal mail, and have set it up on two other computers, one with Outlook Express, one with Mozilla Thunderbird, the former many years ago, the later maybe a year ago, without trouble. With the Mulberry, I'm having some trouble getting the authentication right for both sending and receiving. To be able to receive messages, I must set the authentication to: No Security--prior to that, no luck sending. With this setting, I receive the following message from Mulberry when I try to send: _SMTP server 'RCPT' command reply: 550 Please configure your mail client to use authenication. Account: SMPT _I'm afraid none of the other selections seem to help with sending, and they do prevent receiving as well. With the other clients, simply providing my login user name and password was all that's required, so, I'm not up to speed on what I need to do here. I'd like to use the Mulberry client, but may have to give up if I can figure this out. Any help would be greatly appreciated. On another topic, is it possible to Import from a Mozilla Address Book? I know it wasn't in the list, but it is more current than my Outlook Address Book? Any advice on that, assuming I can get past the first hurdle? Thanks for any help or advice! Bill -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From shiva at sewingwitch.com Sun Feb 14 14:49:52 2010 From: shiva at sewingwitch.com (Kenneth Porter) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:49:52 -0800 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Set up problem In-Reply-To: <4B78290D.1020707@earthlink.net> References: <4B78290D.1020707@earthlink.net> Message-ID: --On Sunday, February 14, 2010 10:47 AM -0600 Bill Huber wrote: > _I'm afraid none of the other selections seem to help with sending, and > they do prevent receiving as well. With the other clients, simply > providing my login user name and password was all that's required, so, > I'm not up to speed on what I need to do here. It's important to understand that with mail, unlike other services, there are *two* servers involved: IMAP (for receiving) and SMTP (for sending). They're configured separately, so you need to create separate Mulberry "accounts" for them. Mulberry also has a completely separate notion of "identities", which represent your From line and a choice of send and receive accounts to use. At the time you compose mail, you can select which identity will be used to send it. You can "tie" identities to a folder hierarchy so that all folders under that folder use the same identity as the default for replies. From ed_siff at unc.edu Mon Feb 15 18:38:07 2010 From: ed_siff at unc.edu (Ed Siff) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Mulberry-discuss] Set up problem In-Reply-To: References: <4B78290D.1020707@earthlink.net> Message-ID: <5B84BAB0F2D4D8163A784F09@[192.168.1.101]> *** At precisely 2/14/2010 11:49 AM -0800, Kenneth Porter sent this: > It's important to understand that with mail, unlike other services, there > are *two* servers involved: IMAP (for receiving) and SMTP (for sending). > They're configured separately, so you need to create separate Mulberry > "accounts" for them. I.E., click SMTP on the Accounts drop-down list, then fill in the server name and your ID. Server: smtpauth.earthlink.net:587 Put in your userid (full email address - userid at earthlink.net) and choose to save it. You don't have to put in the pw, but if you don't the first time (and only the first time) you send mail in each session you'll be prompted for it. Ed